RSB. Blogger Social Responsibility
2008 August 23 2008 
Internet is doing something that long ago we all seek, which is to end injustice. We're sick of always wanting to take us for fools, and that in turn the suppliers of products and services do not meet current market demand, trying to put these guidelines, deaf and trying to hold, through measures have less and less sense.
In this change paradigmatic , two key points in my opinion are: transparency and that the client sends. Transparency is going to be something that is not going to escape any company, and if your picture is not correct, will be very badly. Thus will end up doing well their stuff.
But it also must provide the product that the customer wants and how it wants to receive, otherwise irretrievably lose out. Since more than 10 years ago the invention of the MP3 format and the record companies remain unsolved because they are encouraged to leave their business model, do not dare to risk a change towards innovation. Try to keep their old model, under threat style "if you download an mp3're a pirate" (?)
So, while most of the "bloggers" do (and that's why they gave this phenomenon), we must take responsibility for being part of a means of communication, social implications attached to it. As it is the social responsibility business must also be Blogger Social Responsibility.
I agree but not completely. The freedom of having a blog are such that you can not take things too seriously either. If we become fully responsible could end up as an ultra responsible media and could lose the essence of freedom that gives us a blog.
Internet is the only thing that makes the Internet more democratic (excluding countries like China, of course).
Totally agree with that of the tranpsarencia, a pillar of democracy, and the readers (the customer what they ask), they will use in the near future more and better ways to learn, and this blog has much to do.
The bonds, the dependence of the mass ended the television network Rede. Greetings from Mexico
I hope not to sound negative, but the main problem that I find are the limits. What for me is enough for someone else is just the beginning, and the network pluridad contains so many ways of thinking, and all so diverse, that responsibility from my point of view may be ineffective (or not) from the pespectiva of others.
Congratulations, a very interesting blog.
sorry, my keyboard letters ate. I meant plurality, not "pluridad."