The antisocial web
2009 March 28 2009
On the Web before we know, only creating content, two types of people, who knew programming a website or those who had enough money to pay someone to do them. So to find some information that will help us in search engines, we had to be lucky that someone knows about this issue and also have an idea how to make a website. Little by little, people who knew about many things, but I had no idea how to share, was having more tools to do so. With this style of tools, he was the leap of knowledge, communication and community.
Knowledge and communication (although this is very present in the post), if you want the chat the other day, so if I care about are the negative implications of the effects of community generated.
I've seen several times in the focus of the discussion, whether in social networks of contacts puts them as friends, followers, contacts or other name. That then begs the question of whether those listed are really friends or not. I think that put the name to put each one in your imagination knows where the relationship and gives up no where. At best, a social network enhances the creation of friends, let us see some common interests, which we will facilitate the identification with many more people, new groups created randomly.
Anyway, the point is that the social web allows me to open talks A LOT, meet people, but not everything is rosy. As someone as a friend adds, are also those we do not add us to erase or block us! Then we have the distance that a person, feeling rejected or did not appreciate us makes us very badly!
I will say this is highly debatable, but I think the richer a man feel, is the social wealth. The silver without social connotations no sense. Winning a football game is not valuable for absolutely anyone, no sense. Everything all at one time has a social purpose. Because we are social beings, but we would rock!
The web as a medium, has multiplied about 1000 times the communication possibilities to what was by traditional means. So to be connected with many people but, the chances of being "rejected" grows too, creating a social poverty in the user very hard (obviously depends on the value generated by the contact us). And while it's really nice to have so many friends, talk about many things, we must handle with extreme caution the negative effects.
I think being ignored, being a social being, you feel less than human, as your basic function generator of meaning is not being fulfilled. So we must be very careful with the image that show and we ended up generating. Any mail, twitter or word that is not answered, it has a much greater negative implications than previously thought. In the blogs is kind of weird, because there is still a practical tool that allows us to see if we respoden or not, we look to reenter or susbcribirnos by mail, which is a bit tedious.
I have not really a recommendation to minimize or cancel this effect generated, but it seems more important to keep this in mind. I think to a denial or rejection, we must admit we were not necessarily interesting in the interests of that person, and therefore we must offer something to make you more particular sense, or else pass it to who, if indicated. In turn I think you should answer as many emails as possible, and if we try to understand answer still not ready physically to answer everything that you send us, maybe in the future if, not a bad idea to start working in that 
Well I want to hear your opinion, according to the situations experienced by everyone, they will be able to bring together a lot and maybe we can think of this topic.
Thank you very much.
I fully agree with your point of view. Many times the negative effects of many social relationships are not taken into account and only when we have to perceive yourself.
Linkedin recently join a publisher to offer a possible business that seemed interesting and I both agreed, saying that I knew (of course if it was added to contact xq did not know him, right?). I must admit that this attitude resulted in me a deep rejection and, in my opinion, canceled any future agreement or work with him for not understanding social relations and the way to go unfriendly. He clarified that it was a major publisher but a normal person.
Such actions must be analyzed better and that new social relations require a special sensitivity.
Embrace and look forward to posting on the unfollow day! ;)
I wish to be a stone ...
One can not pretend to like the whole world, neither in real life or on the Internet.
I think you do not have to worry about that much.
Making an analogy with movies Yankee in the movies we see are the "popular", but most people are not so. One usually has like-minded friends, and does not try to please everyone.
@ Germain, or talk, much care must be taken apart in this world of constantly open possibility, we have no idea Quie we can talk!
@ Sebas're not stone, wood resources, Luqui
@ Cristian The idea is not liked by all, if someone falls ill, it is for ideological reasons or whatever, and not bad for you not to answer drop an email. It's more if you dislike and do not want to answer the mail, You can open the game up and say, "I tell you the truth, it bothers me xxxxx" with several who disliked me, I have had many surprises and not talk to me they fell bad and neither knew
Thank you if you are my friends and read the whole post je
It seems very important what you express in this post. I also believe that everyone should create their own identity and should not be influenced by other people (ie not think I have to do something because it does not follow me). Going a little further on this issue, there must be a correlation between public identity shown to the society and our private identity as reflected in our actions and make this balance can be crucial to analyze the relationships with other people and Once we make sense.
Finally, for me no matter the quantity but quality.
Embrace!
We are social beings until they cease to be.
Will we someday ability to respond to all the blogs that you subscribe?
A big hug!
Marce
Hello Joaquin!
What you say is good, but do not think it as well. Having to answer so necessary and so necessary that we answer.
I think every one believes himself the personality you want. Open the game their way. That includes its own communication system. In manner and frequency. If you will answer a guy who does not usually answer almost never, your reaction will be to have achieved a great achievement. But if everyone would answer all the time, so the answer would not enjoy. It's good that wait, but sometimes eternal. That means that we try again with a message more attractive and creative, to capture the attention of Logar once and for all.
I do not know how things will be in the future, but certainly not think the important thing is to respond to everyone. The important thing is and will always say what each of these responses.
Greetings!
Sure! Social wealth .... but there are so many people that you see more cute or learns that ascended in your work, you bought an expensive car and it comes up to you. Maybe an overnight miss all that and the people who approached you walk away, because you look like a failure. It would be very difficult for a successful football team has no people. In fact .... Would go hand in hand these two things. no?
when I went to school nobody gave me a ball! Because I never imported appearances, I never cared to dress well. my classmates thought I was poor when in my house paid more rent paid q expensive, they had the chance to go to a private school and not because the area hize were all religious. Maybe if he had shown all that I had been given importance because they were so sadly! Sometimes people discriminate appearances and these are only appearances!
The issue I am particularly interested, so here goes my first comment:
being that I do, in part to the rarity of online marketing / marketing media marketing 2.0/social / Healing 2.0, I spend much time analyzing and thinking about the things I encounter daily. I have mixed feelings about the "boom" of social networks and contact between humans electronically. There is no doubt that technological advances have provided a lot of things about communication in general, but has not been free, we are more connected than ever, but not necessarily more or less alone together. A good part of the 300 million Facebook users can borrárseles 95% of their "friends" less active and have almost no difference in the volume of communications conducted sincere. And do not talk about the epidemic of attention deficit that is spreading among young people, because the issue is very disappointing, fewer people can focus on complex and significant things, which end up preferring the small doses and not predigested present a greater challenge and require time and thought levels high.
Finally, I am against the "monosilabización" in digital communications, if you do not have the time to answer more than a "yes" / "no" or similar, then it should open the channel with that person, because communication human needs more information so that meaningful and operable.
Greetings!